For Christmas I got an intriguing present from a good friend - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a couple of simple triggers about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of composing, however it's likewise a bit repeated, and very verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's prompts in looking at data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, given that rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can buy any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in anybody's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, wiki-tb-service.com created by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the item is planned as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He intends to expand his variety, generating different genres such as sci-fi, and maybe using an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - offering AI-generated items to human customers.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, archmageriseswiki.com certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are talking about data here, we really mean human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe the usage of generative AI for creative functions must be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without approval need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very powerful but let's build it morally and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have chosen to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have decided to work together - the Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to use developers' content on the internet to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of happiness," states the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its finest performing industries on the unclear guarantee of development."

A government representative stated: "No relocation will be made up until we are absolutely positive we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our goals: increased control for best holders to assist them certify their content, access to premium product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a nationwide information library including public information from a vast array of sources will likewise be made offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the security of AI with, amongst other things, firms in the sector required to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is said to want the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a number of suits against AI companies, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of elements which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector oke.zone is under increasing examination over how it gathers training information and whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It became the many downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a portion of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has plenty of inaccuracies and oke.zone hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But offered how quickly the tech is developing, I'm uncertain how long I can remain positive that my considerably slower human writing and editing skills, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in global technology, with analysis from BBC reporters around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.